The Research Commons
Research, at its core, is a Commons—something that did not exist before humans began systematically exploring their world, that we collectively brought into existence, and whose emergence creates more possibilities for life. Like soil building upon itself through feedback loops, knowledge builds upon previous discoveries in spiraling cycles of understanding. Yet our current research paradigm often treats knowledge as a private resource to be enclosed rather than a Commons to be cultivated.
System Structures That Shape Research
Following Donella Meadows' framework of leverage points, we can examine how current research systems limit collective innovation:
Parameters and Numbers (Least Effective)
Grant amounts
Publication requirements
Citation metrics
These surface-level metrics shape behavior but don't address deeper systemic issues.
Buffer Stocks
The traditional academic system creates artificial scarcity of:
Research funding
Publication access
Institutional positions This scarcity mindset reduces the system's resilience and ability to innovate.
Stock-and-Flow Structures
Knowledge currently flows primarily through:
Peer-reviewed journals
Academic conferences
Institutional partnerships These restricted channels create bottlenecks that slow the circulation of ideas.
Feedback Loops
Current research systems are dominated by reinforcing feedback loops that concentrate resources and authority:
Prestigious institutions attract more funding
Established researchers gain more citations
Successful grant recipients receive more grants These loops create power law distributions that limit diversity and innovation.
Time Lags and the Research Commons
One of the most critical insights from Commons thinking is understanding time lags between actions and consequences. The current "publish or perish" mentality creates several problematic time lags:
Short-term metrics driving long-term research directions
Pressure for quick results preventing deeper exploration
Delayed recognition of emerging problems until they become crises
Loss of traditional knowledge before its value is recognized
Like the water cycle that life has evolved to slow down and recycle, we need research systems that can:
Allow knowledge to "soak in" rather than rushing to conclusions
Create feedback loops that enrich rather than extract
Build upon rather than erode existing knowledge Commons

Information Flows and Rules
Higher on Meadows' leverage points are information flows and rules. Current research systems restrict both:
Information Flows
Paywalled journals limit access
Specialized language creates barriers
Institutional boundaries prevent cross-pollination
Rules
Credential requirements exclude many voices
Funding criteria narrow research scope
Intellectual property laws privatize knowledge
Self-Organization
Even higher on Meadows' leverage points is the power of self-organization. A Commons-based research system would:
Enable communities to define their own research priorities
Allow methodologies to emerge from practice rather than prescription
Support distributed experimentation and learning
Create conditions for "happy accidents" through diverse interactions
Goals and Paradigms
At the highest leverage points, we find system goals and paradigms. Current research operates under paradigms of:
Expert authority
Controlled experimentation
Predetermined outcomes
Individual achievement
A Commons-based paradigm would instead emphasize:
Distributed wisdom
Emergent discovery
Process over outcomes
Collective advancement
Creating Upward Spirals
Like the natural Commons that create more possibilities through feedback spirals, research can create upward spirals of possibility when:
Knowledge remains accessible to all
Different forms of knowing are valued
Feedback loops enrich rather than extract
Time horizons match natural learning cycles
Innovation can emerge from unexpected places
Practical Implications
This Commons-based understanding suggests several interventions:
High Leverage
Shift funding from predetermined outcomes to problem exploration
Create new ownership models for intellectual property
Develop metrics that value collective advancement
Build platforms for knowledge sharing across boundaries
Medium Leverage
Support long-term research without immediate deliverables
Create spaces for cross-disciplinary interaction
Develop new peer review models
Enable distributed experimentation
Low Leverage
Increase grant amounts
Modify publication requirements
Adjust institutional metrics
Beyond Parameters to Paradigms
The most powerful change comes from shifting the fundamental paradigm of research from a private good to a Commons. This means:
Recognizing knowledge as something we cultivate together
Valuing process as much as outcomes
Creating conditions for emergence rather than control
Building systems that enrich rather than extract
Understanding time lags and feedback loops
Final Thoughts
Just as life has created the Commons that make Earth uniquely habitable, humans can create research Commons that expand possibilities for all. This requires moving beyond current paradigms to understand research as a collective process of discovery, one that creates upward spirals of possibility when properly structured.
The future of research lies not in tighter control but in creating conditions where innovation can emerge naturally from our collective wisdom and creativity. By understanding research as a Commons and applying insights from systems thinking, we can build research systems that enrich rather than extract, that create rather than control, and that expand possibilities for all life
Source inspo material I remixed
Paul Krafel - Toward a Commons Culture
Donella Meadows - Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System
—
at this electric juncture in my life, i'm committing to 30 days of micro-essays – a variation of my earlier ‘50 days of writing’ from 2023. while most pieces will be personal reflections mapping this transformative period, others will explore and crystallize ideas surrounding my company. writing, after all, has always been my way of making sense of pivotal moments.
you can follow along in two ways: subscribe to this substack to receive each micro-essay as it's born, landing directly in your inbox. or, if you prefer a weekly rhythm, these pieces will find their way into my newsletter – a consolidated journey of the week's thoughts, revelations and musings. your choice, your rhythm.